Something is wrong.

Can you feel it?

It’s been this way for a long time now. Longer than either of us have been alive. Somewhere along the way the path was lost, yet the push forwarded persisted. No one wants to turn back, because to do so feels like regress. Yet, how does one reach their intended destination if they keep on walking in the wrong direction?

Perhaps I’m mistaken. Perhaps everything is fine. But then where does this sensation deep within me come from? And where does it come from in you? For I have no doubt you feel it too. Though this feeling is undeniable, it seems we should not be able to feel it at all – because even if something indeed is wrong, how should we know it, since it has been wrong ere we drew breath?

19th century German Protestant theologians posited that their society was the end of history. That is to say, they had reached the ultimate destination, the pinnacle of humanity. This Hegelian idea is something that C.S. Lewis referred to as chronological snobbery. From their perch at the end of (then current) time, they could rest assured knowing they knew better then those that came before, and not only did they know better, they were better. It’s a hubris we mostly share with them, for now we look back on them and think much the same about ourselves. Sure, they knew better than the people that came before them, but we know and are so much better than they were. Look at all we have accomplished.

Among the many things deeply ingrained in us by our culture, this is perhaps the strongest concept embedded in our psyche. Humanity gets better as we move forward in time. Stronger, bolder, smarter, more virtuous. After all, we can look into the past and see things like slavery. We’re better than that now. We can look back even more recently and see that computers that used to fill large rooms can now fit in our pockets, and are far more powerful to boot. It’s true, that we have come to see slavery as unthinkable is a great moral victory. It’s true also that our technology has greatly improved. But taking these two data points as indication that indeed humanity is on an unstoppable course toward betterment is a mistake.

Something is wrong… with us. With our society. With our culture.

You sit down at your computer, and you open a web browser. Perhaps you pull up the news from your favorite news feed, or perhaps you open X or BlueSky, or Facebook, or TikTok. You read or listen to a blurb about some defining issue of the day, Ukraine/Russia, Gaza/Israel, immigration, abortion, flag burning, Sydney Sweeney, or Cracker Barrel. You learn your opinion, because you must have an opinion on every single one of those things, and you have to express it loudly, because to not do so would in fact be an immoral act of omission. And then you hate. Particularly if it’s just a faceless name on your screen. Or maybe there’s a face, but it’s not one you know personally. They’re wrong, and not only that, they’re wicked. The same of course is true of the people you do know personally, but you try your best to mute such opinions from them so that you don’t have to think about it. Sure, you probably SHOULD cut that disgusting Trump/moronic Harris supporter out of your life, but you’ve been friends a long time, it would be a shame to end it.

But then there’s this: You walk around in your day to day and have casual encounters with people at work or in stores or at the park or gym, or wherever you go, and you don’t hate them. They’re perfectly kind to you, and you to them. They can often be quite lovely, even when sometimes you can just tell by looking at them and the way they’re dressed, that they’re of a particular political tribe… and it’s not the right one. If you had that conversation, there’d be no stopping the hate. This isn’t normal. And I know it isn’t normal because it’s a historical aberration. This sort of animosity between common people wasn’t a thing prior to Democratic Republics, and those are a very modern invention indeed. You might point to Rome, but it was a different sort of Democratic Republic, the philosophy underpinning modern Democracies hadn’t gotten there just yet. The prominence of the individual, a product of Enlightenment thinkers, was necessary to get us there.

We’ve traveled well down the road of individualism now. Looking out for yourself first is the wisdom of the day. Are you happy? That’s the most important thing. If you’re not happy, you should do the thing you think will make you happy. Leave your spouse, quit your job, get that cosmetic surgery. There’s no reason to be unhappy, if they really love you your family will understand. And God wouldn’t want you to be unhappy either. Really, you and your feelings are the most important thing. And so now we are individuals first, and part of our families and churches and societies second and third and fourth (or perhaps some other order, though you are most certainly at the forefront).

So maybe philosophy is part of why we’re here, and part of why things are wrong.

The other day I saw an article about some smart glasses. You put them on, and they are always recording, always listening and seeing. They were touted as a solution to make you smarter. When someone uses a complicated word you don’t understand it will display to you the definition. It will remember what they said ten minutes ago, or a week ago, and prompt you with the right thing to say to make reference to it. The article treated it like this is some kind of great advancement, but isn’t it fundamentally strange? Rather than you having a conversation the glasses are having it for you. It’s not hard to imagine a scenario where both participants in a conversation are wearing them, and they’re just passive conveyors of information for the two technological tools. It’s utterly unnatural.

It used to be when watching science fiction shows, when the inevitable plot involving an advanced alien race refusing to share their technology with humans surfaced, I would look at it and be frustrated. They needed that technology to save themselves from utter annihilation! But the truth is the technology itself would annihilate them even more surely and totally than the physical threat they were facing. At least they had a chance of defeating that, however slim the odds. In ancient writings like the Book of Enoch, there are explicit warnings about techne, technology as sort of a forbidden knowledge. Take this passage, from Enoch 8:1-2:

1 And Azazel taught men to make swords, and daggers, and shields, and
breastplates. And he showed them the things after these, and the art of
making them; bracelets, and ornaments, and the art of making up the
eyes, and of beautifying the eyelids, and the most precious stones, and
all kinds of coloured dyes. And the world was changed.

2 And there was great impiety, and much fornication, and they went astray, and all their ways became corrupt.

The Bible itself includes examples of techne. The first is the fruit in the garden. In Orthodox tradition, it is thought that man would eventually have reached a point when he would be ready to eat of the tree and gain the knowledge – the sin was in the refusal to wait for the proper time. The tower of Babel is another example. In that instance, man uses techne to try to lift himself up and defy God.

I could give countless examples of current technology that humanity is not ready for, but that we have now. What we call “AI” is one of them. Already people consider ChatGPT and Grok to be authoritative sources of information because they don’t understand how they actually work – that’s not helped by the choice to call them AI when they are nothing of the sort. Social media is not something our brains can handle. The internet as a whole seems to much for us. There’s too much demanding our attention too much of the time and we can’t focus on anything.

And so it seems technology is another part of what is wrong.

It’s not all bad mind you, there does seem to be a connection between a philosophy of individualism and the elimination of slavery. Without technological advancements I probably couldn’t communicate this to you (but would I need to?), and certainly not in this manner. But more people would die of disease and heat or cold or starvation or countless other things that technology is able to prevent. But we’ve also lost a great deal. So much beauty and culture has been lost, species have been destroyed, and ways of life eradicated. To quote Paul Kingsnorth, “The sweep of history is the story of worlds dying, after all.”

There is a tension here. We shouldn’t throw it all away, but we do need to look back, we do need to backtrack and find a way back to a proper course, and we do need to be intentional about how we are interacting in this very strange reality, because we can’t keep living this way.

Something is wrong, and if we don’t fix it, we are doomed.